Pausing is an essential part of clear speech, giving the speaker time to place stresses and the listener time to absorb information. Sometimes (though not often), a pause will go beyond clarity and entirely change the meaning of what is said, as in these 10 examples:
1.Let’s eat, grandma!
2. Let’s eat grandma!
Version
1 is a suggestion to eat something with the listener – ‘grandma’.
Version 2 would indicate the speaker is a cannibal who intends to eat
his grandma; she is the direct object of the verb ‘eat’.
1. A woman without her man, is nothing.
2. A woman: without her, man is nothing.
This
is a famous example of pausing entirely inverting the meaning of a
sentence. Version one has the meaning ‘A woman is nothing without her
man’ and version 2 has the opposite meaning ‘A man is nothing without a
woman’.
1. Oh, no vodka?
2. Oh no! Vodka.
Version
1 uses the exclamation ‘oh’ to show surprise at the lack of vodka.
Version 2 uses the exclamation ‘Oh no!’ to demonstrate a negative
reaction to the presence of vodka. The speaker in version 2 might have a
hangover.
1. Why don’t you run over, Kate?
2. Why don’t you run over Kate?
Version
1 uses the meaning of ‘run over’ as in ‘visit now’, with Kate being the
listener. Version 2 uses the transitive ‘run someone over’ meaning to
hit them with a moving vehicle, with the object being Kate. Kate would
probably prefer to hear version 1.
1. Don’t eat that, honey.
2. Don’t eat that honey.
Version
1 uses the imperative ‘Don’t eat that’, with the determiner ‘that’
referring to an object, ‘honey’ is used as an affectionate term for the
listener in this version, like ‘darling’ or ‘dear’. In version 2, honey
is the object, so the listener shouldn’t eat the honey.
1. Call me, gorgeous, if you like.
2. Call me gorgeous, if you like.
Version one has the imperative ‘Call me’ and this is directed to the listener who is ‘gorgeous’. Version 2 has the imperative ‘Call me gorgeous’ so the speaker believes he is highly attractive and deserves the name ‘gorgeous’.
1. Most of the time, travellers have jet lag.
2. Most of the time travellers have jet lag.
Version
1 has 2 clauses, the main clause being ‘travellers have jet lag’ and
the adverbial clause gives us further information – ‘most of the time’.
The lack of a comma in version 2 indicates that there is just one clause
and ‘time travellers’ is a compound noun in the science fiction sense
of going into the past or future.